I went down the wrong path for a while on this puzzle.  Seeing six reagents and products, I assumed that track would be required, and that this would be a ferocious secondary contest heavily determined by the logic of the layout.  I spent thirty minutes or so with a 90g canvas, brainstorming efficient flows from one glyph to another.

I had forgotten one of the maxims of cost: **glyph access is only necessary for manipulating single atoms**.  But here, the inputs are 2-sticks, the outputs are 2-sticks, and one of the inputs already contains fire.  Once I noticed that, I understood that this was no secondary race--it was a zero-access layout hunt.  Much trickier, and better befitting a second-half tournament puzzle.

*******

That said, it seemed to me that there was not a huge variety of viable layouts.  Triplex requires two hexes with distance 2, and life is much easier if the debonder also has both hexes within distance 2.  With inputs and outputs largely forced, that leaves only 2 more free hexes at distance 2.  And it seemed logical that the calcifier be placed such that 4/7 of the required uses would be convenient, the duplicator placed such that the catalyst could suppress while sitting on it, and the inputs themselves oriented to make suppression easy.  So other than tweaking the relative handedness of the glyphs, this was the only layout I seriously considered.

*******

Layout-limited or not, there are still plenty of nuances here for cycles.  Since I committed early to self-duping for fire instead of using a catalyst, most of these nuances lie in the composition of the scaffolding and the rotation of the triplex bonder--both of which are related.

For example, the most challenging bond to manage is whichever one has no triplex-glyph hexes in line with the arm (in my layout, the red one).  That one needs a squiggle-shaped scaffolding instead of a simple diamond.  The only way to attach a new input to the squiggle involves moving the new reagent counterclockwise through the catalyst input instead of looping around clockwise. And we can kill two birds with one stone if that rearrangement has already been done by output-time, by making that hard-to-manage bond the one that uses air.  Hence my choice of triplex glyph rotation. 

*******

I'm generally no great shakes at G secondaries, so I bet this could go much faster.  But I'll never be sad about finding a tricky min primary, no matter how it places.